<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Cinematical</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com</link><description>Cinematical</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>New to Me: Purple Rain and Stunt Rock</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/29/new-to-me-purple-rain-and-stunt-rock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/29/new-to-me-purple-rain-and-stunt-rock/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/29/new-to-me-purple-rain-and-stunt-rock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/action-and-adventure/" rel="tag">Action</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/music-and-musicals/" rel="tag">Music &amp; Musicals</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/cine-rock-rain.jpg" alt="" /><br /> <br /> As the perpetual young'en on the staff, it only seems fitting that I start chronicling my encounters with whatever classic or otherwise noteworthy titles that I'm just now dusting off and catching up with. For the first in this series, I find myself tackling a double feature of '70s/'80s rock kitsch - <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/stunt-rock/33059/main"><em><strong>Stunt Rock</strong></em></a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/purple-rain/8350/main"><em><strong>Purple Rain</strong></em></a>.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/29/new-to-me-purple-rain-and-stunt-rock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>New to Me: Purple Rain and Stunt Rock</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/29/new-to-me-purple-rain-and-stunt-rock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19257219/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/29/new-to-me-purple-rain-and-stunt-rock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>brian trenchard-smith</category><category>BrianTrenchard-smith</category><category>grant page</category><category>GrantPage</category><category>morris day</category><category>MorrisDay</category><category>new to me</category><category>NewToMe</category><category>prince</category><category>purple rain</category><category>PurpleRain</category><category>stunt rock</category><category>StuntRock</category><dc:creator>William Goss</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Doc Flock</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/29/400-screens-400-blows-doc-flock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/29/400-screens-400-blows-doc-flock/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/29/400-screens-400-blows-doc-flock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/400-screens-400-blows/" rel="tag">400 Screens, 400 Blows</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/beachesagnes400jma.jpg" alt="" /><br />
<br />
Lately I have been looking at some of my year-end awards screeners, mainly the documentaries. My critics' group votes for the year's best documentary; we each vote for our top five and then vote again from the top five finalists. It's not easy to figure out this year's front-runner as of yet, and most of the contenders have been huge yawners. For several years in a row, the big award-winners have always been about war in some form, either WWII or the more recent wars in the Middle East. But this year I have detected grumblings of ennui from the other critics, an ennui that i started developing years ago. This year the favorites appear to be a bit more lighthearted in tone, as well as more local in theme. Rowdy movies like <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/19/sundance-review-anvil-the-story-of-anvil/"><em>Anvil: The Story of Anvil</em></a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/02/capitalism-a-love-story-review/"><em>Capitalism: A Love Story</em></a> (52 screens) and <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/13/review-food-inc/"><em>Food, Inc.</em></a> (5 screens) for example have captured the hearts of my colleagues.<br />
<br />
The Academy threw a monkey wrench in the works when they announced their shortlist of 15 films that they would be considering for Oscar nominations. Following their bizarre rules, it was an odd list; it included many titles that no one has seen, and it eliminated many of the favorites, including <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/17/cannes-review-tyson/"><em>Tyson</em></a> (prompting an interesting <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/20/oscar-snubs-extortion-plot-do-tell/">response</a> from director James Toback), <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/09/good-hair-review/"><em>Good Hair</em></a> (38 screens), <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/30/review-the-september-issue/"><em>The September Issue</em></a> (13 screens), <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/it-might-get-loud/36268/main"><em>It Might Get Loud</em></a> (11 screens), <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/tag/Yoo-Hoo+Mrs.+Goldberg/"><em>Yoo-Hoo Mrs. Goldberg</em></a> (10 screens) and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/more-than-a-game/37454/main"><em>More Than a Game</em></a> (46 screens). The list also eliminated a couple of my favorites, both lively and spirited: Kirby Dick's <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/04/27/tribeca-review-outrage/"><em>Outrage</em></a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/not-quite-hollywood-the-wild-untold/35858/main"><em>Not Quite Hollywood</em></a>, about the history of Australian exploitation cinema.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/29/400-screens-400-blows-doc-flock/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Doc Flock</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/29/400-screens-400-blows-doc-flock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19256424/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/29/400-screens-400-blows-doc-flock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>anvil</category><category>capitalism: a love story</category><category>Capitalism:ALoveStory</category><category>food inc</category><category>FoodInc</category><category>the beaches of agnes</category><category>TheBeachesOfAgnes</category><dc:creator>Jeffrey M. Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Girls on Film: The Femmes Who Defy Convention</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/16/girls-on-film-the-femmes-who-defy-convention/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/16/girls-on-film-the-femmes-who-defy-convention/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/16/girls-on-film-the-femmes-who-defy-convention/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/girls-on-film/" rel="tag">Girls on Film</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/belledejour111509.jpg" /><br />
<br />
A big revelation hit the wire yesterday. Belle de Jour -- a writer named after the film by <a onclick="(new Image()).src='/rg/directorlist/position-1/images/b.gif?link=name/nm0000320/';" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000320/">Luis Bu&ntilde;uel</a> -- came out of the literary closet. She's the British woman who anonymously blogged about her time as a London call girl, wrote books about her experiences, and saw them morphed into television form with the Billie Piper series <em>Secret Diary of a Call Girl</em>.<br />
<br />
Her name is Dr. Brooke Magnanti, and as <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/books/article6917495.ece">the Times describes</a>: "Her specialist areas are developmental neurotoxicology and cancer epidemiology. She has a PhD in informatics, epidemiology and forensic science and is now working at the Bristol Initiative for Research of Child Health. She is part of a team researching the effects of exposure to the pesticide chlorpyrifos on foetuses and infants." Not quite what you were expecting, eh? Over the years, many have sworn that she couldn't be real. She must be a figment of some man's imagination, writing to make sex work look glamorous and ease the mind of lonely types who buy their sexual gratification. But here she is, 100% woman, 100% real, adept not only at the written word, but also medical pursuits. <br />
<br />
On the one hand, I worry that this will inspire Hollywood towards a new torrent of prostitution-laced fare, adding to a business that's already over-saturated as if every Jane, Sue, and Mary have a side gig giving sex for cash. The biz already has more than enough of it, and they really don't need extra encouragement. On the other hand, I find myself enamored with her guts and how perfectly she challenges assumptions on sexuality, intelligence, and artistic flair. Naturally, this made me think about the women of film who defy convention.<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/16/girls-on-film-the-femmes-who-defy-convention/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Girls on Film: The Femmes Who Defy Convention</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/16/girls-on-film-the-femmes-who-defy-convention/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19240549/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/16/girls-on-film-the-femmes-who-defy-convention/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Belle de Jour</category><category>BelleDeJour</category><category>Cinematical</category><category>Girls on Film</category><category>GirlsOnFilm</category><category>Katharine Hepburn</category><category>KatharineHepburn</category><category>Oprah Winfrey</category><category>OprahWinfrey</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>400 Screens, 400 Blows - What's Up with Whip It?</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/15/400-screens-400-blows-whats-up-with-whip-it/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/15/400-screens-400-blows-whats-up-with-whip-it/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/15/400-screens-400-blows-whats-up-with-whip-it/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/400-screens-400-blows/" rel="tag">400 Screens, 400 Blows</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/11/whipit400jma.jpg" /><br />
<br />
Drew Barrymore's <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/02/whip-it-review/"><em>Whip It</em></a> (260 screens) opened seven weeks ago and still hasn't <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/05/girls-on-film-whip-its-undeserved-box-office-bust/">broken even</a> on its initial cost. What's going on? When I walked out of the press screening, the critics were all buzzing about how much fun they'd had. The reviews were stellar: it has an 82% on Rotten Tomatoes. But somehow this critical enthusiasm just didn't translate for viewers. Something about tough chicks beating each other up during roller derby games just didn't appeal to the masses. Maybe it's because the movie is supposed to be set in Texas and was actually shot in Michigan. Maybe it's because our hero Bliss Cavendar (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/ellen-page/2095782/main">Ellen Page</a>) was supposed to fall in love with a cute boy (<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/landon-pigg/2409295/main">Landon Pigg</a>) who really wasn't very interesting, and you actually root for them to break up.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/15/400-screens-400-blows-whats-up-with-whip-it/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>400 Screens, 400 Blows - What's Up with Whip It?</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/15/400-screens-400-blows-whats-up-with-whip-it/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19233865/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/11/15/400-screens-400-blows-whats-up-with-whip-it/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>drew barrymore</category><category>DrewBarrymore</category><category>ellen page</category><category>EllenPage</category><category>whip it</category><category>WhipIt</category><dc:creator>Jeffrey M. Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>400 Screens, 400 Blows - 'Rum' Diary</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/25/400-screens-400-blows-rum-diary/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/25/400-screens-400-blows-rum-diary/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/25/400-screens-400-blows-rum-diary/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/400-screens-400-blows/" rel="tag">400 Screens, 400 Blows</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/rum400jma.jpg"  alt="" /><br />
<br />
Director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0219136/">Claire Denis</a> -- who was born in France but raised in colonial Africa -- enjoyed a measure of art-house buzz when she leapt onto the scene in 1989 with her film <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/chocolat/1006148/main"><em>Chocolat</em></a> (not to be confused with the awful 2000 Johnny Depp/Juliette Binoche movie of the same name). Siskel &amp; Ebert praised it and Denis <a href="http://bventertainment.go.com/tv/buenavista/atm/reviews.html?sec=6&amp;subsec=chocolat">on their show</a> at the time. In 2000, her film <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/beau-travail/7262/main"><em>Beau Travail</em></a> topped the <a href="http://www.filmlinc.com/fcm/1-2-2001/bestof00.htm"><em>Film Comment</em></a> critics' poll of the best films of the year. But in-between, she couldn't catch a break. She has a tendency to make "mood pieces" rather than plot-driven films; these tend to cause people to think, thus making them very uncomfortable. Some of her movies couldn't get distribution and remain difficult to see. Others received only the tiniest distribution and even most critics didn't notice them. Such is the case with her wonderful new <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/35-shots-of-rum-35-rhums/36842/main"><em>35 Shots of Rum</em></a> (2 screens), which is one of the year's best films.<br />
<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/25/400-screens-400-blows-rum-diary/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>400 Screens, 400 Blows - 'Rum' Diary</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/25/400-screens-400-blows-rum-diary/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19207744/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/25/400-screens-400-blows-rum-diary/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>35 shots of rum</category><category>35ShotsOfRum</category><category>cinematical</category><category>claire denis</category><category>ClaireDenis</category><category>film</category><category>movie</category><dc:creator>Jeffrey M. Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Indie Spotlight: New Releases for Oct. 23</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/23/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-23/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/23/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-23/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/23/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-23/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/foreign-language/" rel="tag">Foreign Language</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie-spotlight/" rel="tag">Indie Spotlight</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/ongbak2.jpg" alt="" />Here's a quick look at what's opening in limited release this weekend. If they're not playing where you live, keep an eye out as they make the rounds. And if all else fails, there's always DVD....<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/ong-bak-2-the-beginning/38995/main"><strong><em>Ong Bak 2: The Beginning</em></strong></a> (pictured) is something of a prequel to <em>Ong Bak</em>, the Thai sensation from a few years ago. <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/tony-jaa/2114896/main">Tony Jaa</a>, whose multi-discipline fighting skills are beyond impressive, plays a guy who fights a lot. <em>Cinematical</em>'s Todd Gilchrist <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/23/ong-bak-2-movie-review/">sums up</a> the way many of us felt when we first caught the film at South By Southwest: The fight scenes are spectacular; unfortunately, the plot that holds them together is incomprehensible and takes itself too seriously. At <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10011457-ong_bak_2_2009/"><em>Rotten Tomatoes</em></a>, the critics are almost evenly split between yea and nay, with the only question being whether the awesomeness of the fights is enough to compensate for the dullness of the rest of it. Playing on 10 screens in New York, L.A., San Francisco, Seattle, Boston, and Washington D.C.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/antichrist/38735/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><strong><em>Antichrist</em></strong></a> is an art-house horror film from <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/lars-von-trier/1877201/main">Lars Von Trier</a>, starring <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/willem-dafoe/1009421/main">Willem Dafoe</a> and <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/celebrity/charlotte-gainsbourg/1794875/main">Charlotte Gainsbourg</a> as a grieving couple to whom some supernatural and terrible things happen. It's been appalling audiences since it premiered at Cannes this spring. The <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1210830-antichrist/">critics</a> all seem to agree that it's repellent, grisly, unsettling, and hard to watch. Where they part company -- about evenly down the middle, so far -- is whether that's good or bad. Playing on one screen each in L.A., New York, Chicago, Boston, San Francisco, and Washington D.C. It will also be available through some Video On Demand systems starting Oct. 28.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/23/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-23/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Indie Spotlight: New Releases for Oct. 23</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/23/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-23/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19207628/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/23/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-23/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>antichrist</category><category>featured</category><category>indie spotlight</category><category>IndieSpotlight</category><category>motherhood</category><category>ong bak 2</category><category>OngBak2</category><category>the wedding song</category><category>TheWeddingSong</category><category>untitled</category><dc:creator>Eric D. Snider</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Fear of the Unknown</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/18/400-screens-400-blows-fear-of-the-unknown/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/18/400-screens-400-blows-fear-of-the-unknown/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/18/400-screens-400-blows-fear-of-the-unknown/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/400-screens-400-blows/" rel="tag">400 Screens, 400 Blows</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/sorority400jma.jpg" /><br /> <br /> Just take a look at that weekend box office. Sure, the critically panned <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/09/couples-retreat-review/"><em>Couples Retreat</em></a> came in at #1, earning over $32 million on 3000 screens. But scan down the list and look at #4, which was <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/25/paranormal-activity-review/"><em>Paranormal Activity</em></a>. It earned $7.9 million on 160 screens. That's not a typo. <em>One hundred and sixty</em> screens. If we take the average, <em>Paranormal Activity</em> earned $49,375 per screen, and <em>Couples Retreat</em> took in a paltry $10,666 per screen. That's five times as many butts in the seats for the horror film than for the unfunny comedy (which means that there must have been a lot of empty seats at the latter). There's a simple reason for this: <em>Paranormal Activity</em> is a genuinely scary movie.<br /> <br /> The same goes for any of the "body genres," i.e. comedies, steamy films, weepies, etc. If they genuinely work, and genuinely elicit the response that they promise, they will be a hit every time. Horror buffs -- myself included -- probably see more than a dozen new "scary" movies in the theater each year, but it's only once every few years that we actually get scared at one of them. <em>Paranormal Activity</em> achieves this by doing something very simple and not at all new: it doesn't show anything (or, rather, it shows very little). It knows that nothing that can be shown onscreen can equal the fears and nightmares of the people in the audience, and that the fear of the unknown is the greatest fear of all.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/18/400-screens-400-blows-fear-of-the-unknown/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Fear of the Unknown</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/18/400-screens-400-blows-fear-of-the-unknown/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19198040/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/18/400-screens-400-blows-fear-of-the-unknown/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>movie</category><category>paranormal activity</category><category>ParanormalActivity</category><category>Sorority Row</category><category>SororityRow</category><category>The Final Destination</category><category>TheFinalDestination</category><dc:creator>Jeffrey M. Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Docs on the Rocks</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/10/400-screens-400-blows-docs-on-the-rocks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/10/400-screens-400-blows-docs-on-the-rocks/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/10/400-screens-400-blows-docs-on-the-rocks/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/400-screens-400-blows/" rel="tag">400 Screens, 400 Blows</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/chelsea400jma.jpg" /><br />
<br />
I just saw Gerald Peary's new documentary <a href="http://www.fortheloveofmovies.net/"><em>For the Love of Movies: The Story of American Film Criticism</em></a> -- which incidentally features Cinematical's fearless managing editor <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/bloggers/scott-weinberg/">Scott Weinberg</a> as well as Cinematical alum <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/bloggers/karina-longworth/">Karina Longworth</a> -- and I thoroughly enjoyed it, despite some lumps here and there. I'm having a hard time deciding whether or not non-critics will like it, but it celebrates many of my heroes (James Agee, Manny Farber, etc.) and even included one or two historical tidbits I did not know. One thing it talked about was the immense power wielded by Bosley Crowther at the <em>New York Times</em> from 1940 to 1967 -- he alone could make or break a movie -- until a new generation led by Andrew Sarris and Pauline Kael began to directly challenge him. Crowther was mainly interested in social responsibility in films, films that managed to "say a little something," rather than sheer artistic exercises or works of personality. The new documentary treats Crowther kindly, but dismisses him as a relic.<br />
<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/10/400-screens-400-blows-docs-on-the-rocks/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Docs on the Rocks</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/10/400-screens-400-blows-docs-on-the-rocks/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19190977/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/10/400-screens-400-blows-docs-on-the-rocks/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>chelsea on the rocks</category><category>ChelseaOnTheRocks</category><category>cinematical</category><category>crude</category><category>film</category><category>food inc</category><category>FoodInc</category><category>movie</category><dc:creator>Jeffrey M. Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Indie Spotlight: New Releases for Oct. 9</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/10/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-9/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/10/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-9/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/10/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-9/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie-spotlight/" rel="tag">Indie Spotlight</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/goodh-(2).jpg" />Here's a quick look at what's opening in limited release this weekend. If they're not playing where you live, keep an eye out as they make the rounds. And if all else fails, there's always DVD....<br />
<br />
First, be aware that <em>Paranormal Activity</em> has expanded into 160 theaters nationwide, with screenings all day (not just at midnight). The Coen brothers' <em>A Serious Man</em> (which might stretch the definition of "indie," but still) is also expanding a bit, though still in only about a dozen major cities. <br />
<br />
<strong><em>Good Hair</em></strong> (pictured) is a highly enjoyable documentary by Chris Rock examining African American women's obsession with hair. I saw it at Sundance and, speaking as a white dude, I had <em>no idea</em> it was this big a deal. The black members of the audience, meanwhile, were nodding and smiling knowingly. <em>Cinematical</em>'s Scott Weinberg had much the same reaction I did when he <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/20/sundance-review-good-hair/">reviewed</a> it at Sundance, and all but two of the reviews at <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/good_hair/">Rotten Tomatoes</a> are positive, calling it funny, informative, and enlightening. Playing on about 180 screens in the greater L.A., New York, Chicago, Atlanta, and Washington D.C. areas. <br />
<br />
<strong><em>An Education</em></strong> was a huge hit at Sundance this year, with raves all around for its star (Carey Mulligan) and its director (Lone Scherfig). It's a coming-of-age story about a girl in 1960s London, with a screenplay by Nick Hornby. <em>Cinematical</em>'s James Rocchi <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/01/23/sundance-review-an-education/">adored</a> it; so does <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/an_education/">almost everyone else</a> who has reviewed it. (And one of the pans is from noted contrarian Armond White, who doesn't count anyway.) It's just in New York and L.A. right now, but don't worry: Sony will be pushing it for awards consideration, so you'll get a chance to see it.<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/10/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-9/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Indie Spotlight: New Releases for Oct. 9</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/10/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-9/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19191255/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/10/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-9/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><dc:creator>Eric D. Snider</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Making The (Up) Grade: Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/08/making-the-up-grade-snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/08/making-the-up-grade-snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/08/making-the-up-grade-snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/Animation/" rel="tag">Animation</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/classics/" rel="tag">Classics</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/disney/" rel="tag">Disney</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/home-entertainment/" rel="tag">Home Entertainment</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a></p><div style="text-align: center;"><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/snow2.jpg" /></div>
<br />
If Hollywood's vast abundance of remakes, spin-offs and sequels weren't enough to kill your appetite for spending money on "new" entertainment, it seems like almost every one of these releases finds its way onto home video in multiple forms. Sometimes the studios issue different iterations of a film all at the same time, in a thankful moment of honesty that at least allows consumers the option which version they want. More often, though, the studios will re-release, expand and double-dip their top earners time and time again in order to wring out a few more dollars from the less dull entries in their back catalog. And especially now, during the still-early days of Blu-ray, there's even more new and different editions being released in stores, some of which are honest-to-Jah improvements on the presentation and packaging, while others are merely the next generation of mediocrity.<br />
<br />
As such, welcome to the second installment of "Making The (Up) Grade," a comparison of some of the more high-profile (or maybe just personally-preferred) blu-ray releases with their previous home-video iterations. This week, we're taking a look at <em>Snow White</em>, which Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment is releasing in a three-disc Diamond Edition.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/08/making-the-up-grade-snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Making The (Up) Grade: Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/08/making-the-up-grade-snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19186399/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/08/making-the-up-grade-snow-white-and-the-seven-dwarfs/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>blu-ray</category><category>making the up grade</category><category>MakingTheUpGrade</category><category>snow white</category><category>snow white and the seven dwarfs</category><category>SnowWhite</category><category>SnowWhiteAndTheSevenDwarfs</category><dc:creator>Todd Gilchrist</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>400 Screens 400 Blows - Hello Ponyo, Hello</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/03/400-screens-400-blows-hello-ponyo-hello/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/03/400-screens-400-blows-hello-ponyo-hello/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/03/400-screens-400-blows-hello-ponyo-hello/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/400-screens-400-blows/" rel="tag">400 Screens, 400 Blows</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/ponyo400jma.jpg" /><br />
<br />
This has been one amazing year for animated films. At least four of them are contenders for my list of the year's best films, and a few others are good enough to warrant a second viewing. But despite that, the majority of them are in 3D, and rated PG, neither of which appeals much to my 3-1/2 year old son who is beginning to ask to come to the movies with me. There's one exception, still in theaters, that stands apart from all the rest of the competition: Hayao Miyazaki's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/ponyo/37682/main"><em>Ponyo</em></a> (163 screens). <em>Ponyo</em> is hand-drawn (rather than computer-animated), not in 3D, and so far is the only G-rated movie of the year. (I'm not counting two others: <em>Hannah Montana: The Movie</em>, or <em>Jonas Brothers: The 3D Concert Experience</em>, about which the less said, the better.)<br />
<br />
Yet <em>Ponyo</em> hasn't exactly been lighting its United States audience on fire. Or maybe it just feels like we have already forgotten about it, despite some good voice work by Cate Blanchett, Matt Damon, Tina Fey, Liam Neeson and others. It doesn't seem to be on the cinematic radar anymore, even though it did well in its home of Japan. Perhaps audiences were turned off by the fact that Disney-sanctioned Noah Cyrus and Frankie Jonas were cast to perform the two lead children, or that they recorded a truly insufferable song for the closing credits. Or perhaps the movie is too simple and too gentle. When Miyazaki's gorgeous, dark <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/spirited-away/12056/main"><em>Spirited Away</em></a> opened here in 2002, the time seemed right, and enthusiasm for his work ran high; the movie was ushered in as a major event in the history of animation.<br />
<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/03/400-screens-400-blows-hello-ponyo-hello/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>400 Screens 400 Blows - Hello Ponyo, Hello</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/03/400-screens-400-blows-hello-ponyo-hello/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19182685/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/03/400-screens-400-blows-hello-ponyo-hello/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>hayao miyazaki</category><category>HayaoMiyazaki</category><category>movie</category><category>ponyo</category><dc:creator>Jeffrey M. Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Indie Spotlight: New Releases for Oct. 2</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/02/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/02/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-2/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/02/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-2/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie-spotlight/" rel="tag">Indie Spotlight</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/10/more-than-a-game-20090108101031061_640w.jpg" />Here's a quick look at what's opening in limited release this weekend. If they're not playing where you live, keep an eye out as they make the rounds. And if all else fails, there's always DVD....<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/more-than-a-game/37454/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><em><strong>More Than a Game</strong></em></a> (pictured) is a documentary about basketball phenom LeBron James and four of his Akron, Ohio, high school teammates. <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/more_than_a_game/">Reviews</a> are about evenly split so far, though none are terribly negative. I get the feeling that fans of James and/or basketball will love it while those with a more casual interest might find it lacking. Playing in L.A., New York, and several theaters in the Akron area (nice touch!). The <a href="http://www.nike.com/nikeos/p/nikebasketball/en_US/mtag_ms#/epk/showtimes/">official website</a> has a schedule of when it's opening in other cities. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/afterschool/35404/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><strong><em>Afterschool</em></strong></a> premiered at Cannes last year and has subsequently played at several other festivals, including South By Southwest. It's a drama about students at a New England prep school in the aftermath of a tragedy involving some of their classmates, and how they retreat into YouTube and the Internet to deal with their feelings. About three-fourths of the <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/afterschool/">reviews</a> so far are positive, with critics calling it a sobering, honest look at 21st-century youth. Playing in New York City now. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/a-beautiful-life/30324/main"><strong><em>A Beautiful Life</em></strong></a> is about a runaway teenage girl and an illegal-immigrant teenage boy whose paths cross in Los Angeles. It's based on a play called Jersey City. Bad news, though: All six of the <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/10011735-beautiful_life/">reviews</a> posted so far are negative: melodramatic, heavy-handed, poorly acted, etc., etc. Playing in New York, L.A., Chicago, and San Francisco. <br />
<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/02/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-2/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Indie Spotlight: New Releases for Oct. 2</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/02/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-2/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19182666/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/10/02/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-oct-2/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>a beautiful life</category><category>ABeautifulLife</category><category>afterschool</category><category>chelsea on the rocks</category><category>ChelseaOnTheRocks</category><category>do knot disturb</category><category>DoKnotDisturb</category><category>indie spotlight</category><category>IndieSpotlight</category><category>more than a game</category><category>MoreThanAGame</category><dc:creator>Eric D. Snider</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>400 Screens, 400 Blows - The Best of the Best</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/27/400-screens-400-blows-the-best-of-the-best/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/27/400-screens-400-blows-the-best-of-the-best/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/27/400-screens-400-blows-the-best-of-the-best/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/400-screens-400-blows/" rel="tag">400 Screens, 400 Blows</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/09/northby400jma.jpg" /><br />
<br />
Recently, my uncle -- a film buff to put most other film buffs to shame -- sent me a clipping from the Seattle Times, in which critic John Hartl celebrated the greatest movie year of all time. Not 1939, as is generally accepted, but 1959. And I have to agree with him. It was an amazing time when the old Hollywood guard was winding down and creating their final masterpieces, new upstarts were coming in with fresh new films and the most outrageously artistic of European cinema was getting released (and being watched) in America. Not taking into account any weird release patterns -- such as the fact that Ingmar Bergman's <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/wild-strawberries/5664/main"><em>Wild Strawberries</em></a> (1957) was released here in 1959 -- and based on the IMDB's list of 1959 movies, here's my top ten list for that great year.<br />
<br />
<strong>1. <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/rio-bravo/12332/main">Rio Bravo</a>. </strong>On most days, this is my favorite Western, with its combination of breathless suspense sequences and easy camaraderie among its bizarre, almost deliberately mismatched cast (and especially for Dean Martin and Ricky Nelson's duet). Howard Hawks directs with fluid grace, but best of all is that exchange of dialogue between Ward Bond and John Wayne. Bond: "A game-legged old man and a drunk. That's all you got?" Wayne: "That's what I got."<br />
<br />
<strong>2. <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/good-morning-ohayo/16831/main">Good Morning</a>. </strong>This is Yasujiro Ozu's lightest, warmest and funniest film, about two boys who -- fed up with the polite, meaningless conversation of adults -- take a vow of silence until their father buys them a television set. Their father refuses, having heard that television will produce "100 million idiots." (He may have been right.) Even if you don't like this one, Ozu also delivered the equally great Floating Weeds the same year.<br />
<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/27/400-screens-400-blows-the-best-of-the-best/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>400 Screens, 400 Blows - The Best of the Best</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/27/400-screens-400-blows-the-best-of-the-best/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19174450/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/27/400-screens-400-blows-the-best-of-the-best/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>1959</category><category>anatomy of a murder</category><category>AnatomyOfAMurder</category><category>cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>movie</category><category>north by northwest</category><category>NorthByNorthwest</category><category>pickpocket</category><category>rio bravo</category><category>RioBravo</category><category>some like it hot</category><category>SomeLikeItHot</category><dc:creator>Jeffrey M. Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 09:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Indie Spotlight: New Releases for Sept. 25</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/25/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-sept-25/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/25/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-sept-25/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/25/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-sept-25/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/comedy/" rel="tag">Comedy</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/documentary/" rel="tag">Documentary</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/drama/" rel="tag">Drama</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/foreign-language/" rel="tag">Foreign Language</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/horror/" rel="tag">Horror</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/independent/" rel="tag">Independent</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/new-releases/" rel="tag">New Releases</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/indie-spotlight/" rel="tag">Indie Spotlight</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" align="right" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/09/paranormal-activity.jpg" />Here's a quick look at what's opening in limited release this weekend. If they're not playing where you live, keep an eye out as they make the rounds. And if all else fails, there's always DVD....<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/paranormal-activity/33046/main"><em><strong>Paranormal Activity</strong></em></a> (pictured) is finally coming to theaters after premiering two years ago at Screamfest. It's a simple horror concept: married couple believes their house is haunted; sets up camera to film the things that go bump in the night; pants-wetting ensues. <em>Cinematical</em>'s Kim Voynar was <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/01/31/slamdance-review-paranormal-activity/">terrified</a> by it when she caught it at Slamdance 2008, and our Eugene Novikov was similarly <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/11/telluride-review-paranormal-activity/">enthralled</a> at Telluride this year. At <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/paranormal_activity/">Rotten Tomatoes</a>, all but one of the reviews are similarly positive. Hooray for low-budget indie thrillers! Now playing in Seattle, Boulder, Tucson, Baton Rouge, Columbus, Orlando, Ann Arbor, Madison, Wis., and Santa Cruz, Calif.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/the-boys-are-back/38093/main"><em><strong>The Boys Are Back</strong></em></a> stars Clive Owen as a newly widowed father of two boys. It's directed by Scott Hicks, who made <em>Shine</em> and <em>Hearts in Atlantis</em>. <em>Cinematical</em>'s Monika Bartyzel had <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/13/the-boys-are-back-movie-review/">praise</a> for the film when it premiered at Toronto, saying it's occasionally great and often very sweet. At <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1208165-boys_are_back/">Rotten Tomatoes</a>, 64% of the reviews are positive -- not a smash, but very solid. Playing in New York and L.A.<br />
<a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/i-hope-they-serve-beer-in-hell/38201/main?icid=movsmartsearch"><br />
<strong><em>I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell</em></strong></a> is based on douchebag-and-proud-of-it Tucker Max's memoirs detailing his escapades as a carousing womanizer and general tool. Matt Czuchry plays Max in the film, which takes the form of a road-trip buddy comedy. Now playing in about 120 theaters nationwide. Only 22% of the <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_hope_they_serve_beer_in_hell/">reviews</a> so far are positive, with most critics calling it juvenile, derivative, and unfunny. <br />
<br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/25/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-sept-25/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Indie Spotlight: New Releases for Sept. 25</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/25/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-sept-25/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19174298/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/25/indie-spotlight-new-releases-for-sept-25/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>blind date</category><category>BlindDate</category><category>brief interviews with hideous men</category><category>BriefInterviewsWithHideousMen</category><category>coco before chanel</category><category>CocoBeforeChanel</category><category>i hope they serve beer in hell</category><category>IHopeTheyServeBeerInHell</category><category>indie spotlight</category><category>IndieSpotlight</category><category>paranormal activity</category><category>ParanormalActivity</category><category>providence effect</category><category>ProvidenceEffect</category><category>the boys are back</category><category>the other man</category><category>TheBoysAreBack</category><category>TheOtherMan</category><dc:creator>Eric D. Snider</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:45:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Asian Melodramas</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/20/400-screens-400-blows-asian-melodramas/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/20/400-screens-400-blows-asian-melodramas/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/20/400-screens-400-blows-asian-melodramas/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/400-screens-400-blows/" rel="tag">400 Screens, 400 Blows</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/09/stillwalk400jma.jpg" alt="" /><br /> <br /> When the average American film fan thinks of Japanese movies, they'll probably picture one of three things: either a samurai or a gangster -- <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001536/">Toshiro Mifune</a> and his sword, or <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001429/">Takeshi Kitano</a> and his gun -- or a stringy-haired ghost girl. Die-hard fans will know that Yasujiro Ozu, Nagisa Oshima and Mikio Naruse also made contemporary dramas about modern-day citizens, often trying to figure out their lives in the post-WWII turmoil. But those dramas were hindered by the times, or by the censors; the characters were polite and functional and hid their own true emotions in an attempt to do what they were supposed to be doing. But there's something in the air over in Japan right now; they're making melodramas, big, roiling, red-blooded ones filled with anguish and torment and heartbreak.<br /> <br /> Earlier this year, <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0475905/">Kiyoshi Kurosawa</a> -- who is thus far best known for his truly terrifying films like <em>Cure (</em>1997) and <em>Pulse</em> (2001) -- came out with <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2008/05/18/cannes-review-tokyo-sonata/"><em>Tokyo Sonata</em></a>, a devastating (but defiantly odd) look at a crumbling family. The father loses his job, the eldest son contemplates joining the U.S. military and the youngest son sneaks off for secret piano lessons, while the mother finds herself kidnapped by a charismatic burglar. Kurosawa somehow ties together these plot threads with a few scenes at the family home, in which little of the stuff that we can see happening actually gets discussed. It's a brilliant portrait of disconnect and lack of communication.<br /> <br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/20/400-screens-400-blows-asian-melodramas/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Asian Melodramas</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/20/400-screens-400-blows-asian-melodramas/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19166903/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/20/400-screens-400-blows-asian-melodramas/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>hirokazu koreeda</category><category>HirokazuKoreeda</category><category>kiyoshi kurosawa</category><category>KiyoshiKurosawa</category><category>movie</category><category>park chan wook</category><category>ParkChanWook</category><category>still walking</category><category>StillWalking</category><category>thirst</category><category>tokyo sonata</category><category>TokyoSonata</category><dc:creator>Jeffrey M. Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 09:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Disease of the Week</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/13/400-screens-400-blows-disease-of-the-week/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/13/400-screens-400-blows-disease-of-the-week/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/13/400-screens-400-blows-disease-of-the-week/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/400-screens-400-blows/" rel="tag">400 Screens, 400 Blows</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/09/sistersadam400jma.jpg" /><br /><br />One of my absolute least favorite genres is the "disease of the week" movie. There are lots of genres I prefer less than others, but in the case of this one, I can't understand why people like it. Why would anyone want to go see a movie about people getting sick and probably dying? The nearest I can figure is that, for viewers who like to cry, this is an almost certain tearjerker. Otherwise, perhaps it makes viewers feel good about not being sick. Who knows? But this week, fate has handed me an almost perfect example of what I hate about this genre, as well as an alternate example of just how it can work.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/26/review-my-sisters-keeper/"><em>My Sister's Keeper</em></a> (262 screens) is the bad one, though it does begin with a good idea. Anna Fitzgerald (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1113550/">Abigail Breslin</a>) was created in a test tube essentially to provide "spare parts" for her older sister, Kate (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1100839/">Sofia Vassilieva</a>), who is stricken with leukemia. When Anna reaches the age of ten, she approaches a lawyer (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000285/">Alec Baldwin</a>) to sue for the rights to her own body. But rather than following that lead, the movie then spends the bulk of its running time in the hospital with Kate, watching her get sick and throw up while others weep and study test results. She gets a little brief romance, but it ends tragically. The worst thing of all is that, despite all this focus on Kate, she never emerges as a character. She's always good-natured, strong and loving. (We see her dark side only once, in a flashback.) Essentially, she is <em>defined</em> by her disease. She is "cancer girl" and nothing more.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/13/400-screens-400-blows-disease-of-the-week/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Disease of the Week</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/13/400-screens-400-blows-disease-of-the-week/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19156258/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/13/400-screens-400-blows-disease-of-the-week/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>adam</category><category>cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>movie</category><category>my sisters keeper</category><category>MySistersKeeper</category><dc:creator>Jeffrey M. Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Girls on Film: Redefining "Fangirl"</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/08/girls-on-film-redefining-fangirl/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/08/girls-on-film-redefining-fangirl/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/08/girls-on-film-redefining-fangirl/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/fandom/" rel="tag">Fandom</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/girls-on-film/" rel="tag">Girls on Film</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/09/fangirls090609.jpg" alt="" /><br /> <br /> The term "fangirl" should be innocuous -- a simple description of a girl who is a big fan of something or someone. A person of the female persuasion who loves something beyond basic appreciation, who wears her love and adoration on her sleeve. But over the years it's been awarded with a pesky stigma, a dark cloud that elicits shudders of distaste.<br /> <br /> This came about long before <em>Twilight</em> -- back to the earlier days of media when <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmoERkjLUpg">Beatlemania</a> was going strong, when Michael Jackson moonwalked himself into the hearts of crying, shrieking young'ens everywhere. (And let us remember that these included boys as well.) I'll never forget watching a television special on fangirls in my own youth, and wondered why they were shaking, crying, and screaming as if tortured by the sight of McCartney or Lennon hitting the stage in the '60s, or the mere glimpse of Jackson's sparkling glove in the '80s. Some overwhelmed tears might be expected, but not a full-scale mental and emotional meltdown. Not hormones on fire.<br /> <br /> Today, it's all about vampires and a certain high school girl ready to give up everything for a young man that sparkles. Tomorrow it will probably be something else. But before another tide hits, we've got to look at this thing called "fangirl."<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/08/girls-on-film-redefining-fangirl/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Girls on Film: Redefining "Fangirl"</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/08/girls-on-film-redefining-fangirl/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19149438/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/08/girls-on-film-redefining-fangirl/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>Cinematical</category><category>Comic-Con</category><category>featured</category><category>Girls on Film</category><category>GirlsOnFilm</category><category>Twilight</category><dc:creator>Monika Bartyzel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 20:03:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Smooth Terminator</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/07/400-screens-400-blows-smooth-terminator/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/07/400-screens-400-blows-smooth-terminator/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/07/400-screens-400-blows-smooth-terminator/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/400-screens-400-blows/" rel="tag">400 Screens, 400 Blows</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/09/startrek400jma.jpg" /><br /><br />In the late summer of 1993, all serious movie geeks had their eyes on two movies. The first one was <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107076/"><em>Hard Target</em></a>, which marked the American debut of the great Hong Kong action director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000247/">John Woo</a> (whose great <em>Hard-Boiled</em> had recently been in theaters), and the second was <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/07/07/scenes-we-love-true-romance/"><em>True Romance</em></a>, which was the second screenplay by <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/21/interview-quentin-tarantino/">Quentin Tarantino</a>, whose <em>Reservoir Dogs</em> had been out the year before. I enjoyed both of the new movies just fine, but I kept thinking: what if these two productions had simply switched directors? Tony Scott could have directed the latest Jean-Claude Van Damme snoozer (and hence I wouldn't have bothered to pay money to see it) and then John Woo could have taken over the Tarantino screenplay! How cool would that have been? <em>True Romance</em> would have been the greatest movie, ever!<br /><br />Something vaguely similar happened this summer, but to a much lesser degree. I'm talking <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0009190/">J.J. Abrams</a> directing <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/07/review-star-trek/"><em>Star Trek</em></a> (218 screens), and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0629334/">McG</a> directing <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/05/20/review-terminator-salvation/"><em>Terminator Salvation</em></a> (81 screens). What if they had switched places? Neither one of them is any great shakes as a director, but I'd put my money on McG as the more interesting of the two. OK. Hear me out. <em>Star Trek</em> had a terrific script, with a really unique idea; it's perhaps the smartest series reboot I've yet seen, but Abrams' clunky direction drove the action to a dead halt at least half a dozen times. On the other hand, the screenplay for <em>Terminator Salvation</em> was pretty much unsalvageable, but McG put together some truly dazzling set pieces, using clean, fast gliding cameras to catch the movement and space of the action scenes. <br /><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/07/400-screens-400-blows-smooth-terminator/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Smooth Terminator</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/07/400-screens-400-blows-smooth-terminator/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19150099/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/09/07/400-screens-400-blows-smooth-terminator/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>cinematical</category><category>featured</category><category>film</category><category>j.j. abrams</category><category>J.j.Abrams</category><category>mcg</category><category>movie</category><category>star trek</category><category>StarTrek</category><category>terminator salvation</category><category>TerminatorSalvation</category><dc:creator>Jeffrey M. Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:33:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Just Being in 'Beeswax'</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/30/400-screens-400-blows-just-being-in-beeswax/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/30/400-screens-400-blows-just-being-in-beeswax/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/30/400-screens-400-blows-just-being-in-beeswax/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/400-screens-400-blows/" rel="tag">400 Screens, 400 Blows</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/08/beeswax400jma.jpg" /><br /><br />I'm still not exactly sure how to describe the films of <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1216004/">Andrew Bujalski</a>. I've seen all three of his features, <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/funny-ha-ha/15114/main"><em>Funny Ha Ha</em></a> (2002), <a href="http://www.moviefone.com/movie/mutual-appreciation/24727/main"><em>Mutual Appreciation</em></a> (2005) and the new <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/03/15/sxsw-review-beeswax/"><em>Beeswax</em></a>, which is currently playing on 2 screens in New York and Los Angeles and will expand to more theaters in the coming weeks. <em>Funny Ha Ha</em> really struck me when I saw it in 2004, but I think his films have improved since then, and <em>Beeswax</em> is really something wonderful. Of course, the word most people use to describe his films -- and other similar films in the same "wave" -- is "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumblecore">Mumblecore</a>," and I suppose that's effective, but there's more to it.<br /><br />Bujalski tends to focus on young people in their twenties and thirties. They're educated and middle-class, but probably not the most driven folks in the world. One character in <em>Beeswax</em>, Merrill (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1493163/">Alex Karpovsky</a>), prepares to take the BAR, but when he doesn't do so well his first day, he shrugs: "it will still be there for me in six months. And then six months after that." The movie focuses on identical twins, Jeannie, who runs a vintage clothing shop, and Lauren, who is currently unemployed but thinking of taking a job in Nairobi. They're played by real-life twins <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3229180/">Tilly Hatcher</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3228932/">Maggie Hatcher</a> (whom Bujalski has known for years); Tilly needs a wheelchair to get around, but the movie refuses to make a big deal out of this. It's just there.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/30/400-screens-400-blows-just-being-in-beeswax/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Just Being in 'Beeswax'</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/30/400-screens-400-blows-just-being-in-beeswax/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19142796/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/30/400-screens-400-blows-just-being-in-beeswax/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>andrew bujalski</category><category>AndrewBujalski</category><category>beeswax</category><category>cinematical</category><category>film</category><category>movie</category><dc:creator>Jeffrey M. Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 09:02:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Literary Devices</title><link>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/23/400-screens-400-blows-literary-devices/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/23/400-screens-400-blows-literary-devices/</guid><comments>http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/23/400-screens-400-blows-literary-devices/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/columns/" rel="tag">Columns</a>, <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/category/400-screens-400-blows/" rel="tag">400 Screens, 400 Blows</a></p><img hspace="4" border="1" vspace="4" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.cinematical.com/media/2009/08/rick400jma.jpg" /><br /><br />Sam Mendes' <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/06/05/review-away-we-go/"><em>Away We Go</em></a> (54 screens) makes for a great trailer, consisting of all the very funny, snarky stuff written by <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1101630/">Dave Eggers</a> and <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2905972/">Vendela Vida</a>. The actual movie has some very funny moments as well, and some terrific individual scenes, but it doesn't add up to a reasonable whole, mainly because the ever-shifting tones never quite mesh. Nevertheless, it seems to be performing well in its arthouse capacity, surviving more on a well-executed stream of hype rather than on the quality of the movie itself. From the ads, you'd think it has already won an Oscar (and, because of this kind of subconscious suggestion, it still might). Either way, what this means is that a literary giant like Eggers didn't have to go slumming. His reputation is intact.<br /><br />In the old days, great novelists would sometimes write for the movies, but it was sneered at and looked down upon. Movies were for hacks and has-beens, or for desperate sellouts who were willing to work for cash rather than for the reward of a richer soul. <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001203/">William Faulkner</a> was perhaps the most famous example of this, scribbling screenplays for drinking money. Fortunately, nowadays, Mr. Faulkner's literary reputation not only remains totally intact, but also some of his screenplays, including <em>To Have and Have Not</em> (1944) and <em>The Big Sleep</em> (1946), are celebrated for their high quality. Similarly, Billy Wilder once hired the great crime novelist <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0151452/">Raymond Chandler</a> to adapt a book by another great crime novelist, James M. Cain, into <em>Double Indemnity</em> (1944). I can only imagine the indignity Chandler must have felt at the time, but today no one cares.<p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/23/400-screens-400-blows-literary-devices/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>400 Screens, 400 Blows - Literary Devices</em></a></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/23/400-screens-400-blows-literary-devices/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/forward/19134666/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.cinematical.com/2009/08/23/400-screens-400-blows-literary-devices/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>away we go</category><category>AwayWeGo</category><category>cinematical</category><category>daniel handler</category><category>DanielHandler</category><category>dave eggers</category><category>DaveEggers</category><category>film</category><category>movie</category><category>rick</category><dc:creator>Jeffrey M. Anderson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:02:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>